Ethics of Authenticity

Charles Taylor: I like China [!] ?

[Politics Nation and Trump Bancruptcy.]

Remembering Rorty!

Or is it dis~membering? 

The point?  The Clash?

Unfortunately, links don't last, but that is not the point.  Or maybe that is physics.  The issue is...
Hegelian and Straussian, and maybe Wittgenstinian* and Nietzschian, let alone Manichean.
The point is the ongoing project.  **

* (spell check later)
[Lost in the draft: Crying Neo-Wolf?]
(~) - / - ?

** having now actually read the Rorty piece, I will simply note a Kantian judgement, to be parsed later. 

Lie Bury[!]

Write off the bat, I will reference the heading: 
Books, links, Lay Buried/NFRY.

The inspiration ? 
Openly Secular: Not necessarily.

O~W [!]
(Akin to FP ~ of 6 links)*
Spoiler alert: ala FP? Or legend of sorts...
The (#'s) below are the sequence of inserting above.
The M-beds within are links to blog searches of this blog.**

(4.) April 23rd, Openly Secular Day!
(1.) The Labor Market Conundrum: The Cyclical And The Secular
(2.) What Would Don Draper Do? Reading Dante in a Secular Age
(5.) Document Proclaims Secular Government
(6.) Mullahs and Heretics [!]
(3.) The Godless Delusion*

* Bingo: Started Reading!
** these italics are bibliographing in progress

* 4MAT SHIFT (3-26-15)
The Dig ?  2b Kantinued ?

 

Hegelian Rationality?

HR? Proposed Concept.

For the science religion dichotomy/dilemma. (1-2)
Rationality and irrationality at(3) the same table, and in the same chair.  (shoes/feet/mouth/toss)*
VC: a Virtuous Clog?  P5+1 example.  Cotton pick'n GOP another. 
State of Strauss and the Torah the antithesis? 

Zion is asemantic!

Process proposal?  Kant we... Waltz?

*pundittering additions
(#'d)inserts [ s~r , d/d ]  :: (3) youtube IAM  :: VC vital cognisance? :: State'n Hegel? 
Original aphorism?  (Wit'N Pythagorus)
Lables TBA : T'issue Tan'go?  :: (to be Kantinued)

M-bed F'N:
Strauss :  a. No Teddy , Para~graph Three! , Monday Morning Rally... , Bin(un)Jun'Go , Hegelian Rationality? , Neo-changian? , Relemma'n Leo , Esoteric Relemma[!]
  
RIG^ / SOG subj/obj geometry  : RIG'N progress ~ N = poetics^ / Nietzsche? (tot~ology)
 [ dit , IF,  IW ] ~ lie`bearE? akin to NFR~'Y
Numbers R objective ideal and subjective reality? Cultural conditioning? 25~min.> systemic analysis/
meanfeltic[!] stastical rhetoric?  Meta-Clastic?

Bin(un)Jun'Go

2 links
in progress.
Steve Smith (watching)in progress. [('n Strauss)!]

Previous reference and reL8ted viewings.

i.p. Fukuyama/Kaplan...

(ReLabelism)
[/] 1. (FP!) , 2. Proof of Life... 3. The Hope
i.p.  1.  ★Re-initialism★ , 2. Mises... , 3. Cultural Threads are Fine. 4.  Neo-Context

March Forth ?  [Lost in the Phrey?]

3-5-15: 1st things (above 'n labels!). 
Lede or Ship? [C-font!] (intro/content/) (heading/goal?)
Bin- parsing of bingo and un-circular file / (un)~Jung or circular / Go~Hegelian [!]
Line 3 some articles and links re: Steve Smith (Straussian?)
L4: PR& Strauss Lectures.

Note: It may not be obvious, but I don't always get back to read everything labeled NFRY or NFR.
While NFR may mean not necessarily needing to, NFRY indicates a hope to.  Then
fortuitus $hits happen.  Like the opening of the last link(LM frying pan), and the parsing of 4-2-it-us?  Not to men shun(A2~?)   [ahhhh! ???] Let alone one liners.*

Now to the^^ point at the mo'ment.  Acon Ference? **

*(FPip)(???)~ The Un-Revolved(~) Thread / (ahhh)~ commercial goat scream / (?)~Jenga / (A2)~et tu / (shun) USCroll click / (men)~[lost or redone'dented] / (to)~Jung& / GnotS

** a file of sorts un red[!]or yetT for 2? (Or tent4text) /~gno-M~BA
Loose unMbeds? O'w[!]? ^
^D'Ribble saved in draft
^^ 2B read and viewed
[ final note !: that's the ticket ? ] ( fp: Still in draft? ) [knot necessarily gunuh]
fur cation?




Saux?(~\~) ow~/~ew what?



That's what!

Net and Yahoo?

No disrespect.
Nor circular wag'N train.
or empty chair ?

[!] It must mean... [!]
[the un-tan'g'ent]

^?~ n ? : x. The New Compendium y. The Billy Club... z. More Gill~Let? [!]

Anticipation Project ^

Or Atlantic/Pacific ?
RIP*, or prophetic affect ? 

(~)
Actually I have pretty much already bookended or bracked this text with notes and hyperlinks.  My original inspiration was in the field of geometric religion or practices.  The source is a project in The Atlantic(1) and further deconstruction involved that magazine as well. 

(~)CAUTION:  AS UN- EMBEDDED TO BE KANTINUED [!]

Now for the prospectin' ofor conceptions?  Or mining from the lede(or ship):
"The Islamic State is no mere collection of psychopaths. It is a religious group with carefully considered beliefs, among them that it is a key agent of the coming apocalypse. Here’s what that means for its strategy—and for how to stop it."

Now may be just the right time to stop
or wind down my own parsing or~religions~key~apocalypse.* 

(~)R,R,R~[!]

* Anachronistic Reasoning?
^ work in progress(2)[!]
(2) ring E dingy~N.

(~): Scroll Click?

* un circular file ?

Para~graph Three!

Endo-terror~cism?

aka Academics ?

The point?  The esoterics of Strauss maybe the Socratics of Plato, or exoterics of Neitzsche.

Ctrl F (academic:~:academics)
:::  aka [a. FOOTNOTE JUNE 2013 PAGE TWO, b. The Daily Counter Balance , c.(J) In the begining... , (D)BoC, e. Belated Breaking News! , f. THE COUNCIL OF NICE , h. Back-Log August 19th, ("religious ghetto") , i.(G).]
:::   ? [a. Looking Back , b. "if I were dictator" , c. What's good for the goose? Goose the gander! , d. Bane(Or) Change , e. Conservative Foray (4A) ,  f. Blame to go around? , g. Will Safire Replaced by Will I ams., h. Academic Freedom , i. Framing Narratives , j. In the begining... , k. Technical Difficulties , l. The Thorn and the Lyin' , m. Running Joke , n. Let me finish? , o. We are at the table. , p.Forward (Ironically)  ]
(what the fudge?  f-j,p?)
:::   Endo-suffix?

The project  ?   The dance? 
"Esotericism is the practice, widely employed by a variety of thinkers prior to and up through the early Enlightenment, of disguising their real meaning through ellipsis, surface contradiction, dispersal of their real arguments, and the like (indeed—they were misleading casual readers about their true intentions!). The understanding that philosophers like Plato and Aristotle made use of esotericism was central to Strauss’s own project of returning to their thought as an antidote to what he called the “crisis of modernity”, since it pointed to deeper truths hidden behind the evident meaning extracted by superficial readers. It was probably also one of the sources of distrust of Strauss and his followers by other academics, since it implied that initiates into the art of esoteric interpretation had access to meanings unavailable to others." Francis Fukuyama.
Or Ecto~tonics of Aristotle?  Less than Ionic that paranormal came up in  English [?]
P.4,The Prince misquote? P.5 "undermine dogmatism" bingo~? P.6 Nietzsche Recurrance
"That latter struggle was ultimately won, and led to the triumph of the “harmonist” view, now almost universally accepted, that philosophical truth could be made compatible with and indeed supportive of modern politics. Transparency is today the name of that venerable game. Classical philosophers like Plato and Aristotle had a different view; namely, that philosophical skepticism undermined the irrational beliefs necessary to the maintenance of a political community and therefore needed to be kept under wraps. As Melzer points out, there is a large body of contemporary scholarship that actively contends that virtually no one other than a few cranks ever wrote esoterically; he performs a great service by, first, showing that the claim is empirically wrong, and second, that it is itself an historically contingent interpretation." (ibid.)
 
2-25-15 2 ~ B Kantinued ;-) R I P ? [!]
(1) a. Who Let the Dogs Out?, b. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government., c. ...what about the damage to your Presidency?, (d.) The Curve or Nuance Thing, e. Doxology.
(2)~
(3)  The Be All and End All?

Pen~ta-gone? i.e. P5
"This section of the book is wonderfully erudite and leaves no uncertainty that esotericism was indeed a major art that is now all but lost. Melzer points to four reasons for past uses of esotericism. First, it served as protection from prosecution; he notes its widespread use in totalitarian countries like the former Soviet Union and contemporary China. Second, it served to protect the political community from dangerous truths, such as philosophical skepticism about the city’s gods and traditions; third, it served a pedagogical purpose by forcing readers to engage on a deeper level; and fourth, it was used as a transitional strategy for modern writers seeking to undermine dogmatism." (ibid)
P6?  At this Platonic # I will note Aristotle's place in the Nietzschean struggle.  
Hence Fukuyama is a difficult read of Strauss and Plato who are difficult reads.

P7? "If Philosophy Between the Lines were simply a book..." (where P = par.) I might plow on[!]
@9   "Strauss’s central concern was what he called the 'crisis of modernity', where the project of using philosophical reason for practical purposes was in danger of collapse."
@12 "The recovery of the rationalist project was central to Strauss’s life work—"
Having now fully read it, I will let you decide.

Relemma'n Leo

Facebook :  Image



Credit



 

 

 

( Belated Credit Not THE Original Source [?] )

De-Hegelian~Geometrics?
Plato, Hegel, Hume or Wittgenstein
Betrand Russell  /  ? Thank Dog ~I have~ a hard copy[!]

(2-18-15) (F'n P! or ER?) [Neo-jugate or Neo-sophist ? ?  Re:O]
(:~:) Strauss B. Told[!]
 

Esoteric Relemma[!]

Waltzing with (Leo)Strauss:**  ~(o.p. 2-17-15)
Relemma Revisited
Not exactly.*

* No Teddy

(FP!)

** 2-18-15 Not to pun on Peter, Paul or Pan Rand, but this^^ is a few degrees into(1) acadamia(2). 

(1)^ A. SHOCK and AWE(UPDATE) , B. Give 'em a break!
(2)  Clash of Civilizations (m-bed'ed in A.) 
^ links flip-flopped, re:scroll over alph-click
Speaking of read: Rat Races Van Mices?   I am a bit discontent with my reading of Democracy's Discontent. 
^^ NFRY That's the ticket [!] Three paragraphs in I need to reboot or check the irony.

[...] not the flack but (~)the flock.(*) (:~:) ?
(*)- need to delineate flack 'n flock

The Turd Farce[!]

Knot the forth be with us[!]

Know Labels / No Elect.

[!] speaking of thirds or forces:  Stet(sic) Iron knee darn it[!]

{... not that ... [?]}

Location, location, location.

" Sources, sources, sources [!]" 
Not to parse ... nor tangent.

(FP1)*

* yet to post Footnotes Page One(June, '14)
Asterisk(1) pulled from b.s.@[!] (i.e. blog search) May the source BwU.

My original crack~ refers to references and sharing.  It is not conceivable that some could read all the material they** share on social networks.  To be less obtuse, there are sources read, sources cherry picked, and sources quilted. 
(to be continued)***
draft:
Bold = read 
italics=more to read
** Courier = at this juncture b. s. *
*** see labels
~ last insert
[On the matter of reading this...(not yet) but also see italic nor, yet recall D.D. Runes !]

[FP1 redate 6-14-14]

Reducks[!] in a row.

Dark Matter, Anti-Matter

Tan Gent Shalls?

Knot n' gnaught?
A, B, C ? [?]

It is not Watergate revisited, it is Pentagon Plame Redux.
There is a difference between the leaker and the journalist.
Every time a sentence begins with "every time" you  know it is smoke, not to mention borderline conspiracy if not tin-foil.
"You can't handle..." in "wack"!?!
Complements to the Jack/Cruise "handle" or Wilson/Papers Arch.(PPR/WPA)
"THIS WEAK[!]" - - - oar This Leek? (Talk about draft[!])

[6-10-13: not to derail(or de-spoke) the band wagon or charge the inarticulated bus...but...? ]

Re:Figure

Decomposing?


Decalm Posting?
Or Knot 2B?

[figure from link 2 ] Figure N! *

[*4-9-13 GEB update credit/links/title: Mobius Band I, 1961 (also re:label from** Image to Figure.)]
** found via Kant Escher Godel? NFR